I watched the clip. All I saw was a really bad rap about gender fluidity / sexuality. What people do with their bodies is their business, not mine, and not the state's business either as long as nobody gets hurt.
The only way that this detracts from Bill Nye's credibility is his willingness to book substandard acts.
So quite clearly you're not the science-y type after all because you have no problem with the anti-science that Nye is peddling. I always knew the group of you were more science fetishists than real adherents to scientific evidence and inquiry.
Go read about Dr. Money, the father of surgical reassignment surgery, and how his unscientific views of gender destroyed the lives of his early patients. Then read about Dr. Paul McHugh the head of psychiatry at Johns Hopkins U for 35 years who spent more time than anyone else studying gender dysphoria and found that reassigning one's gender led to greater unhappiness in the patient and almost 20 times the suicide rate (and why? because realizing after time having your dick attached is actually a good thing). His studies found that 80% of pre-pubescent children who suffered from gender dysphoria self-corrected once they came through puberty; yet people want to give 4 and 5 year old's hormones to delay puberty and start transition, aided by the useful idiots like Bill Nye peddling this faux-science tripe to kids, damning them to a life of incredible pain and unhappiness. It shows all the signs of a mental disorder yet people like Nye wanna sing songs about the joy of cutting one's dick off. Charming and abusive. (The current evidence suggests than most trans people are homosexuals who have eroticised their own female image and have confused that with wanting to be that image. Rather than trying to merge the mind with the biological reality (changing the malleable rather than the immalleable), progressives look to alter the body permanently to match the mind (changing the immalleable rather than the malleable); the exact opposite of what should be rationally done, as progressives are wont to do in almost all areas of life).
And what about the growing group of "transabled" people? What are you going to tell them? They believe one of their limbs isn't part of their body so they have them amputated to feel whole. An arm or a dick; what's the difference really? If you hold to the modern gender nonsense then you cannot logically stand in the way of preventing people from amputating other limbs because of their "feelings". What about those who identify as animals or different species? What about headmates? You have no coherent way of affirming transgender people as legitimate without also having to affirm the psychoses of the other myriad of mentally ill and their feelings-first identities. It's complete bollocks and if you weren't so married to the nonsense I think you'd admit it.
So all you modern progressives aren't about science at all; you're about maintaining a certain narrative no matter the harm. So forgive me for not taking any of you seriously when you value feelings over facts. It's shameful.
If you don't dislike him why did you call him a paedophile? Over here, making such accusations without proof is called libel and can put you in court. I don't find paedophilia funny as I know plenty of people who were hurt by it.
Now, if you were to frame this differently - pose a question regarding scientific research into gender fluidity, you might have got a proper debate going by now. It's a pity that Nuna and Wandering Hermit left as I miss their insight and clarity.
And I don't find telling boys that if you just cut your dick off you can be a girl very funny either; in fact I find it as abusive if not more so than pedophilia. And yet you want to promote the former. Shameful.